Performance Anti Patterns
This section covers various recommendations to improve the performance of your Hazelcast IMDG clusters.
A Hazelcast member assumes it is alone on a machine, so we recommend not running multiple Hazelcast members on a machine. Having multiple members on a single machine most likely gives a worse performance compared to running a single member, since there will be more context switching, less batching, etc. So unless it is proven that running multiple members per machine does give a better performance/behavior in your particular setup, it is best to run a single member per machine.
By default, Hazelcast uses the machine’s core count to determine the number of operation threads. Creating more operation threads than this core count is highly unlikely leads to an improved performance since there will be more context switching, more thread notification, etc.
Especially if you have a system that does simple operations like put and get, it is better to use a lower thread count than the number of cores. The reason behind the increased performance by reducing the core count is that the operations executed on the operation threads normally execute very fast and there can be a very significant amount of overhead caused by thread parking and unparking. If there are less threads, a thread needs to do more work, will block less and therefore needs to be notified less.
Tweaking can be very rewarding because significant performance improvements are possible. By default, Hazelcast tries to behave at its best for all situations, but this doesn’t always lead to the best performance. So if you know what you are doing and what to look for, it can be very rewarding to tweak. However it is also important that tweaking should be done with proper testing to see if there is actually an improvement. Tweaking without proper benchmarking is likely going to lead to confusion and could cause all kinds of problems. In case of doubt, we recommend not to tweak.
When benchmarking, it is important that the benchmark reflects your production environment. Sometimes with calculated guess, a representative smaller environment can be set up; but if you want to use the benchmark statistics to inference how your production system is going to behave, you need to make sure that you get as close as your production setup as possible. Otherwise, you are at risk of spotting the issues too late or focusing on the things which are not relevant.